Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00300118

Oral Budesonide vs. Oral Mesalazine in Active Crohn's Disease (CD)

Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomized, Multicentre Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Budesonide (9 mg) and Oral Mesalazine (4.5 g) in Moderately Active Crohn's Disease Patients

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
311 (actual)
Sponsor
Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH · Industry
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether mesalazine or budesonide is more active in the treatment of active Crohn's disease.

Detailed description

Crohn's disease is often treated with glucocorticoids or mesalazine. Both drugs are indicated for active Crohn's disease. Treatment with mesalazine is indicated for the treatment of mildly to moderately active Crohn's disease. Budesonide 9 mg/day or mesalazine 4.5 g/day are better than lower doses. So far only one trial compares the efficacy and safety of budesonide and 5-ASA. The result of this trial is that budesonide is more effective in inducing remission than mesalazine. The primary objective of this trial is to confirm this result for other presentations of budesonide and mesalazine; i.e. Budenofalk® capsules (9 mg/day) and Salofalk® tablets (Eudragit-L-coated oral mesalazine; 4.5 g/day) in moderately active Crohn's disease. Mesalazine is used in this trial as a comparator.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGbudesonide9 mg
DRUGmesalazine4.5 g

Timeline

Start date
2004-09-01
Primary completion
2008-05-01
Completion
2008-05-01
First posted
2006-03-08
Last updated
2014-05-19

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Germany

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00300118. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.