Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00290290
Efficacy Study of Antiseptic Preoperative Scrubs in Prevention of Postoperative Infections
Chlorhexidine-Alcohol Versus Povidone-Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis:A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 849 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Most cases of infection of clean-contaminated wounds (wounds without gross spillage of organisms from the gastrointestinal tract) are thought to originate from the skin. Therefore, it is conceivable that application of an optimal antiseptic agent can reduce the rate of surgical wound infections. This trial is to compare the impact of disinfecting the skin with Chloraprep (2%chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol) vs. Betadine on the rates of infection of clean-contaminated surgical wounds. The study will also assess the occurrence of adverse effects on the skin from either antiseptic agent and the cost-savings associated with the use of Chloraprep vs Betadine.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial. All adult patients, who are scheduled for a clean-contaminated surgical procedure of the alimentary, respiratory, reproductive or urinary tract will be asked to participate.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | chlorhexidine-alcohol | Preoperative skin preparation with scrub and paint technique |
| DRUG | Povidone-Iodine | preoperative skin preparation with scrub and paint technique |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2003-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2008-05-01
- Completion
- 2008-05-01
- First posted
- 2006-02-13
- Last updated
- 2014-09-18
- Results posted
- 2014-08-11
Locations
6 sites across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00290290. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.