NCT00208416

A Randomised Multi-centre Study to Compare the Short-term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Surgery in Primary Total Hip Replacement

Randomised, Prospective, Post-Market Surveillance Study Comparing the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Conventional Surgical Procedures in Subjects Requiring Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis.

• Status: Terminated
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 58 (actual)
• Sponsor: DePuy International · Industry
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 75 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of two surgical techniques, minimally invasive and conventional, when used in the treatment of patients with hip joint disease requiring a total hip replacement. Patients who enter the study will be randomly allocated to undergo surgery using the minimally invasive or conventional surgical technique and will be evaluated at regular intervals following hip surgery using patient, clinical and x-ray assessments with a focus on short term rehabilitation.

Conditions

• Osteoarthritis(Primary)

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	DePuy MI System	A minimally invasive surgical technique used in total hip replacement.
PROCEDURE	Conventional surgical technique	A conventional surgical technique used in total hip replacement

Timeline

• Start date: 2005-10-01
• Primary completion: 2007-12-01
• Completion: 2014-11-01
• First posted: 2005-09-21
• Last updated: 2016-05-11

Locations

2 sites across 1 country: United Kingdom