Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00164853
Compare Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones
Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones-a Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 180 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
To compare the technique of combined balloon sphincter dilation after an initial sphincterotomy and standard sphincterotomy in the endoscopic removal of large bile duct stones. The investigators hypothesize that combined balloon dilation and sphincterotomy allows for easier stone removal without added morbidities when compared to standard sphincterotomy.
Detailed description
Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a standard technique to enlarge the bile duct opening before stone removal during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, complete sphincter ablation by endoscopic sphincterotomy is not always possible. Also, due to the tapering end of the distal duct, standard sphincterotomy may not be adequate for removal of particularly large stones. In a retrospective series by Ersoz et al, the addition of balloon dilation after sphincterotomy achieves a high stone clearance rate (89-95%). The investigators postulate that the combination of endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by balloon dilation may allow easier stone retrieval with acceptable complication rate.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | endoscopic balloon dilatation | Refer to description under arms |
| PROCEDURE | Standard sphincterotomy | Refer to under arms |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2005-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2011-09-01
- First posted
- 2005-09-14
- Last updated
- 2012-02-17
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00164853. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.