Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT00164853

Compare Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones

Combined Sphincterotomy and Balloon Dilation (ESBD) Versus Standard Sphincterotomy (ES) in Removing Biliary Stones-a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180 (actual)
Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

To compare the technique of combined balloon sphincter dilation after an initial sphincterotomy and standard sphincterotomy in the endoscopic removal of large bile duct stones. The investigators hypothesize that combined balloon dilation and sphincterotomy allows for easier stone removal without added morbidities when compared to standard sphincterotomy.

Detailed description

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a standard technique to enlarge the bile duct opening before stone removal during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. However, complete sphincter ablation by endoscopic sphincterotomy is not always possible. Also, due to the tapering end of the distal duct, standard sphincterotomy may not be adequate for removal of particularly large stones. In a retrospective series by Ersoz et al, the addition of balloon dilation after sphincterotomy achieves a high stone clearance rate (89-95%). The investigators postulate that the combination of endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by balloon dilation may allow easier stone retrieval with acceptable complication rate.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREendoscopic balloon dilatationRefer to description under arms
PROCEDUREStandard sphincterotomyRefer to under arms

Timeline

Start date
2005-09-01
Primary completion
2011-09-01
First posted
2005-09-14
Last updated
2012-02-17

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00164853. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.