Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00147134
A Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer(JCOG 0404,CRC Surg-LAP/OPEN)
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 1,050 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Haruhiko Fukuda · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate oncological outcome of patients for T3 and T4 colorectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic versus open surgery.
Detailed description
The benefits of laparoscopic surgery (LAP) in comparison to open surgery (OPEN) have been suggested with respect to decreased morbidity, decreased pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay.1-4 However, the long-term survival of LAP for colorectal cancer is still unclear, especially for advanced colorectal cancer requiring extended lymphadenectomy. Thus, the investigators designed a study which investigates whether LAP is suitable for advanced colorectal cancer with respect to survival and post-operative morbidity.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | open colectomy | Procedure/Surgery: open colectomy |
| PROCEDURE | laparoscopic colectomy | Procedure/Surgery: laparoscopic colectomy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2004-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-03-01
- Completion
- 2014-03-01
- First posted
- 2005-09-07
- Last updated
- 2016-09-22
Locations
26 sites across 1 country: Japan
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00147134. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.