Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT00033631
Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Stage II Prostate Cancer
A Phase III Randomized Study Of High Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT Versus Standard Dose 3D-CRT/IMRT In Patients Treated For Localized Prostate Cancer
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 1,534 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Group · Network
- Sex
- Male
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
RATIONALE: Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. It is not yet known which dose of radiation therapy is more effective in treating stage II prostate cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of two different doses of specialized radiation therapy in treating patients who have stage II prostate cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: * Compare the overall survival of patients with stage II adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with high- vs standard-dose three-dimensional conformal or intensity-modulated radiotherapy. * Compare the freedom from prostate-specific antigen failure, disease-specific survival, local progression, and distant metastases in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the probability of tumor control and normal tissue complications in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the incidence of grade 2 or greater genitourinary and gastrointestinal acute and late toxicity in patients treated with these regimens. * Compare the quality of life, including sexual function, of patients treated with these regimens. * Correlate histopathologic or tumor-specific cytogenetic or chromosomal markers with cancer control outcomes in patients treated with these regimens. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (Gleason score 2-6, PSA ≥10 mg/mL but \< 20 ng/mL vs Gleason score 7, PSA \< 15 ng/mL) and radiation modality (three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy \[3D-CRT\] vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy \[IMRT\]). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I: Patients undergo standard-dose 3D-CRT or IMRT once daily, 5 days a week, for 7.8 weeks (39 treatment days). * Arm II: Patients undergo high-dose 3D-CRT or IMRT once daily, 5 days a week, for 8.8 weeks (44 treatment days). Quality of life (QOL) is assessed initially at baseline. After completion of radiotherapy, QOL is assessed every 3 months for 1 year and then every 6 months for 4 years. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,520 patients (760 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 5 years.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| RADIATION | 70.2 Gy 3D-CRT/IMRT | Radiation will be delivered via 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in 1.8 Gy minimum dose fractions to a total of 70.2 Gy in 39 Fractions. All fields treated once daily, five fractions per week. No more than 2% of the planning target volume and none of the clinical target volume may receive less than 70.2 Gy. |
| RADIATION | 79.2 Gy 3D-CRT/IMRT | Radiation will be delivered via 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) or intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in 1.8 Gy minimum dose fractions to a total of 79.2 Gy in 44 fractions. All fields treated once daily, five fractions per week. No more than 2% of the planning target volume and none of the clinical target volume may receive less than 79.2 Gy. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2002-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-04-01
- Completion
- 2022-12-22
- First posted
- 2003-01-27
- Last updated
- 2023-01-18
- Results posted
- 2017-02-08
Locations
86 sites across 2 countries: United States, Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT00033631. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.